From tim.bird at am.sony.com Tue May 6 22:28:00 2008 From: tim.bird at am.sony.com (Tim Bird) Date: Tue May 6 22:33:56 2008 Subject: Updated moin package for Fedora Message-ID: <4820BF50.1010405@am.sony.com> Hi all, I installed moin on a new Fedora-8 server, and decided to use the latest moin source (1.6.3). In the process, I ended up re-building the source and binary RPM for moin. I had to modify the patches slightly, but otherwise the update went very smoothly. If anyone is interested in the new source package, I can upload it somewhere. This is my first experience with freshrpms, and the first RPM I've ever updated on Fedora. I have long experience with RPM, but none with Fedora. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thanks, -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America ============================= From chris.wailes at gmail.com Sat May 17 17:49:29 2008 From: chris.wailes at gmail.com (Chris Wailes) Date: Sat May 17 17:49:41 2008 Subject: gstreamer-plugins-bad error Message-ID: <4015fd830805170849ma9b5113v6ce22f19967553bf@mail.gmail.com> When using yum to install gstreamer-plugins-bad for Fedora 9 x86_64 I receive the following error during the transaction check: Error: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstladspa.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.7-1.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.7-1.fc9.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-good is installed from the regular Fedora repo. I currently only have the Fedora and Freshrpms repos enabled and use yum-priorities to give them priorities of 1 and 2 respectivly. If more information is needed or there is any way that I can help I would be glad to respond to any requests. Thanks for a great repo, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.egwn.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/attachments/20080517/b628a486/attachment.html From ghisha at email.it Sat May 17 18:17:38 2008 From: ghisha at email.it (Giandomenico De Tullio) Date: Sat May 17 18:18:45 2008 Subject: gstreamer-plugins-bad error In-Reply-To: <4015fd830805170849ma9b5113v6ce22f19967553bf@mail.gmail.com> (from chris.wailes@gmail.com on Sat May 17 17:49:29 2008) References: <4015fd830805170849ma9b5113v6ce22f19967553bf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1211041059.24865.0@Defiant> In data 17/05/2008 17:49:29, Chris Wailes ha scritto: > When using yum to install gstreamer-plugins-bad for Fedora 9 x86_64 I > receive the following error during the transaction check: > > Error: Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstladspa.so from install of > gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.7-1.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.7-1.fc9.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-good is installed from the regular Fedora repo. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515978 see what "upstream" says about ladspa in -good > If more information is needed or there is any way that I can help I > would > be > glad to respond to any requests. force installation of -bad to replaced "OLD" ladspa.so plugin From jon.roland at the-spa.com Tue May 20 22:59:39 2008 From: jon.roland at the-spa.com (Jon Roland) Date: Tue May 20 23:15:08 2008 Subject: Where is Kate editor? Message-ID: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> After installing Fedora 9 and also the various KDE 4 packages, including KDEBase, which is supposed to contain the Kate editor, I find that it did not get installed. Katepart and KWrite are there, but not Kate itself. Am I missing something, or did it get omitted somehow? -- Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------- Starflight Corporation 7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 www.pynthan.net starflight@pynthan.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- From jon.roland at the-spa.com Wed May 21 00:20:56 2008 From: jon.roland at the-spa.com (Jon Roland) Date: Wed May 21 00:21:12 2008 Subject: Where is Kate editor? In-Reply-To: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> References: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> Message-ID: <48334EC8.807@the-spa.com> Have been informed that it has been moved from the KDEBase to the KDESDK package, which was installed successfully. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Starflight Corporation 7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 www.pynthan.net starflight@pynthan.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- From jon.roland at the-spa.com Wed May 21 00:26:23 2008 From: jon.roland at the-spa.com (Jon Roland) Date: Wed May 21 00:26:39 2008 Subject: Ekiga package crashes In-Reply-To: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> References: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> Message-ID: <4833500F.5050909@the-spa.com> On install of Fedora 9, using the Add/Remove Software tool, it crashes at the point where I try to set/test the webcam on my HP dv6775us laptop. Corresponding Windows version works okay on same machine (dual-booted). -- Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------- Starflight Corporation 7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 www.pynthan.net starflight@pynthan.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- From jamatos at fc.up.pt Wed May 21 00:07:30 2008 From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?iso-8859-1?q?Jos=E9_Matos?=) Date: Wed May 21 00:32:36 2008 Subject: Where is Kate editor? In-Reply-To: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> References: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> Message-ID: <200805202307.30958.jamatos@fc.up.pt> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:59:39 Jon Roland wrote: > After installing Fedora 9 and also the various KDE 4 packages, including > KDEBase, which is supposed to contain the Kate editor, I find that it > did not get installed. Katepart and KWrite are there, but not Kate > itself. Am I missing something, or did it get omitted somehow? Since a command is worth a thousand words: ;-) $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/kate kdesdk-4.0.4-2.fc9.i386 > -- Jon > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Starflight Corporation 7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757 > 512/299-5001 www.pynthan.net starflight@pynthan.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Jos? Ab?lio From dtimms at iinet.net.au Wed May 21 15:49:08 2008 From: dtimms at iinet.net.au (David Timms) Date: Wed May 21 15:59:50 2008 Subject: Where is Kate editor? In-Reply-To: <200805202307.30958.jamatos@fc.up.pt> References: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> <200805202307.30958.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Message-ID: <48342854.8050805@iinet.net.au> Jos? Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:59:39 Jon Roland wrote: >> After installing Fedora 9 and also the various KDE 4 packages, including >> KDEBase, which is supposed to contain the Kate editor, I find that it >> did not get installed. Katepart and KWrite are there, but not Kate >> itself. Am I missing something, or did it get omitted somehow? > > Since a command is worth a thousand words: ;-) > > $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/kate > kdesdk-4.0.4-2.fc9.i386 Though better still in the general case where it is not currently installed: $ yum whatprovides /usr/bin/kate kdesdk.i386 : ... You only have to guess the /usr/bin part then ;) From daniel.rey at gmail.com Wed May 21 16:00:49 2008 From: daniel.rey at gmail.com (Daniel Rey) Date: Wed May 21 16:00:59 2008 Subject: Conflict with gstreamer-plugins-bad in Fedora 9 Message-ID: Trying to install gstreamer-plugins-bad in Fedora 9 fails with this message: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstladspa.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.7-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.7-1.fc9.i386 Regards, Daniel -- Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler --Albert Einstein From lfwelty at nc.rr.com Wed May 21 17:56:51 2008 From: lfwelty at nc.rr.com (lfwelty) Date: Wed May 21 19:01:17 2008 Subject: is apt4rpm still expected to work w/ ayo.freshrpms.net? Message-ID: <48344643.7050605@nc.rr.com> [sorry if this is a dup. resending from subscribed e-mail] Hi, I'm having a hard time getting apt4rpm to work with freshrpms. Is apt still supported here? Here's my freshrpms.list: rpm http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/9/i386 freshrpms Here's the errors I'm seeing: melete|ROOT-18# apt-get update -f Get:1 http://apt.kde-redhat.org fedora/9/i386 release [1134B] Get:2 http://download.fedora.redhat.com fedora/linux/development/i386/os/ repomd .xml [2424B] Get:3 http://apt.kde-redhat.org all release [1468B] Get:4 http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/9/i386 release [244B] Fetched 5270B in 0s (5694B/s) Hit http://apt.kde-redhat.org fedora/9/i386/stable pkglist Hit http://apt.kde-redhat.org fedora/9/i386/stable release Hit http://apt.kde-redhat.org all/stable pkglist Hit http://apt.kde-redhat.org all/stable release Err http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/9/i386/freshrpms pkglist 404 Not Found Get:1 http://download.fedora.redhat.com fedora/linux/development/i386/os/ primar y.sqlite [6634kB] Get:2 http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/9/i386/freshrpms release [128B] Get:3 http://download.fedora.redhat.com fedora/linux/development/i386/os/ fileli sts.sqlite [10.9MB] Fetched 17.5MB in 41s (424kB/s) Failed to fetch http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/9/i386/base/pkglist.freshr pms 404 Not Found Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done W: Release file did not contain checksum information for http://ayo.freshrpms.ne t/fedora/linux/9/i386/base/pkglist.freshrpms W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Thanks for the help, Frank. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Frank Welty | Earth is a beta site, I just wish that damn lfwelty@nc.rr.com | pink elephant would give me my mouse back. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From johnthacker at gmail.com Thu May 22 06:25:12 2008 From: johnthacker at gmail.com (John Thacker) Date: Thu May 22 06:25:30 2008 Subject: Where is Kate editor? In-Reply-To: <48342854.8050805@iinet.net.au> References: <48333BBB.7070404@the-spa.com> <200805202307.30958.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <48342854.8050805@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: <73aec80805212125n1185f240m5bd39369ed034fa1@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:49 AM, David Timms wrote: > Jos? Matos wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:59:39 Jon Roland wrote: >>> >>> After installing Fedora 9 and also the various KDE 4 packages, including >>> KDEBase, which is supposed to contain the Kate editor, I find that it >>> did not get installed. Katepart and KWrite are there, but not Kate >>> itself. Am I missing something, or did it get omitted somehow? >> >> Since a command is worth a thousand words: ;-) >> >> $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/kate >> kdesdk-4.0.4-2.fc9.i386 > > Though better still in the general case where it is not currently installed: > $ yum whatprovides /usr/bin/kate > kdesdk.i386 : ... > > You only have to guess the /usr/bin part then ;) If it is currently installed, OTOH, then a better option is $ rpm -qf `type kate` (or `which kate` if you use tcsh or the like) Why guess anything? ;) From Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr Thu May 22 12:54:28 2008 From: Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr (Nicolas Thierry-Mieg) Date: Thu May 22 13:01:52 2008 Subject: is apt4rpm still expected to work w/ ayo.freshrpms.net? In-Reply-To: <20080522100003.994D0F2C94@mx32b04.es6.egwn.net> References: <20080522100003.994D0F2C94@mx32b04.es6.egwn.net> Message-ID: <483550E4.1080800@imag.fr> > I'm having a hard time getting apt4rpm to work with freshrpms. > Is apt still supported here? > > rpm http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/9/i386 freshrpms apt supports repomd (yum) format try this in your freshrpms.list: repomd http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/9/i386/freshrpms HTH