rpmfusion

[Dario Castellarin]

Which approach will be chosen for kernel modules? Freshrpm's dkms, 
Livna's kmod or maybe both with opportune Obsoletes? As I really enjoy 
the dkms "snappiness" and I wouldn't really like to see it disappear...

Dario

Matthias Saou ha scritto:
> Ismael Olea wrote :
>
>   
>> This means rpmforge is dead? :-m
>>
>> It's the first time I've read about rpmfusion .
>>     
>
> No! But it does mean freshrpms as we know it is going to ultimately be
> "put down", though :-)
>
> But Dag, Dries and others are going to continue what is currently
> rpmforge.net as rpmrepo.org. So basically, for a _really_ quick summary
> of the current repository changes :
>
> - freshrpms merges with rpm.livna.org and dribble as rpmfusion
>   -> Packages for Fedora and for EL with EPEL
> - rpmforge merges (I think) with CentOS Extras as rpmrepo
>   -> Packages for Fedora and for EL without EPEL
> - atrpms stays the same
>   -> Packages for Fedora and for EL without EPEL (I think)
>
> (I hope I didn't get anything wrong here :-D)
>
> Matthias
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.egwn.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/attachments/20071002/8778402f/attachment.html