libdca contains devel headers and static libs

[Matthias Saou]

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote :

> FreshRPMS' libdca package should actually be named libdca-devel, because
> it contains static libs and headers. The two binaries should be moved
> to libdca-tools perhaps. Then we would avoid bugreports like:
> http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1602
> 
> Of course, that would never happen if we had rpmfusion ready, but we're
> not there yet. Can someone sell me some free time? ;)
> 
> In the meantime, could you at least fix your libdca package so that it
> conforms to Fedora packaging guidelines?

Fixed, but there might still be problems, since I've updated to 0.0.5
(which now builds a shared library by default, BTW) which provides a
library names libdca and not libdts like before.

As upstream seems to be moving away from the "dts" names for good,
programs and libs using libdca with the old names will probably need
some patching in order to get things right.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) - Linux kernel 2.6.22.2-57.fc7
Load : 0.22 0.31 0.31